
Self-Killing : The Unseemly recurring decimal around town
By Eben Enasco Kingsley
Today in Nigeria communities, "Self-murder", "Self-killing", " Suicide", is becoming a modern unseemly trending concept around our neighborhood.
The irony of it all is, the age range pathetically involved in the" Self-murder" parochialism, is a source of varying concern to all citizens.
Arguably, the modern etymology of reported "Self-killings" have been linked to economic hardship, poverty, inability to care for one's self, peer group influence, uncontrolled socio engagement, sexual violence and harassment, frustration and most likely depression.
Others are spiritual influences, family factors, incurable terminal diseases and lots more.
Medical experts have revealed in their research that some of the early signs that someone may be thinking or planning to commit suicide to include change in behaviour or the presence of entirely new behaviours, when a person is always talking or thinking about death or killing self, when a person loses interest in things he or she used to care about before and making comments about being worthless, helpless or hopeless.
Others include when the person has depression, takes risks that could lead to death, sudden switch from being very sad to being happy, visiting or calling people to say goodbye, looking for a way to kill themselves, such as searching online for materials or means, acting recklessly and withdrawing from activities to mention a few.
For easy access to death, many victims have thought out and engaged themselves in the consumption of corrosive and poisonous sniper, meant for the eradication of rodents, flying and crawling insects.
Lately, several report has emerged of incidences across the four walls of the country with no one having idea on when this prevailing circumstances will end.
From north down south it is a unifying factor either through suicide bomb detonation on self or attempts to gulp corrosive chemicals to end ones' live.
There is a surging trend of Nigerians committing suicide with about 80 killed in the last 13 months, according to reported incidents collated by Daily Trust.
More than Seventy-nine people had committed suicide between April 8, 2017, and May 12 this year, according to the data obtained by Daily Trust from content analysis of Nigerian newspapers.
Majority of the reasons given for the reported suicides range from financial difficulty, marital problems, academic challenges, among others.
Lagos State leads the pack with 14 reported cases within the period under review.
Close to 800 000 people die globally due to suicide every year, which is one person every 40 seconds, the World Health Organisation (WHO) said.
According to WHO Suicide Ranking, with 15.1 suicides per 100,000 population in a year, Nigeria is now the 30th most suicide-prone (out of 183 nations) in the world.
Nigeria is also ranked 10th African country with higher rates of suicide, leading countries like Togo (ranked 26th), Sierra Leone (11th), Angola (19th), Equatorial Guinea (7th), Burkina Faso (22nd) and Cote d'Ivoire (5th).
The International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) said suicide occurs throughout the lifespan and is the second leading cause of death among 15-29-year olds globally.
According to valid reports, suicide is a global phenomenon; in fact, 78 percent of suicides occurred in low- and middle-income countries in 2015.
Suicide accounted for 1.4 percent of all deaths worldwide, making it the 17th leading cause of death in 2015.
There are indications that for each adult who died of suicide there may have been more than 20 others who have attempted suicide.
The indices of the trending "Self killing" has risen overtime with countless of such incidents anticipated to be mounting.
In Nigeria, self killing is a taboo and a crime in some parts of the world. However, while suicide has been decriminalized in the western countries, the act is still stigmatized and discouraged.
In other contexts, suicide could be utilized as an extreme expression of liberty, as is exemplified by its usage as an expression of devout dissent towards perceived tyranny or injustice which occurred occasionally in cultures like ancient Rome or medieval Japan.
While a person who has died by suicide is beyond the reach of the law, there can still be legal consequences in the case of treatment of the corpse or the fate of the person's property or family members.
The associated matters of assisting a suicide and attempting suicide have also been dealt with by the laws of some jurisdictions. Some countries criminalise suicide attempts.
Historically, laws against suicide and mercy killing have developed from religious doctrine, for example, the claim that only God has the right to determine when a person will die.
In ancient Nigerian Ethics, a person who had died by suicide (without the approval of the authority) was denied the honours of a normal burial.
The person would be buried alone, on the outskirts of the city, without a headstone or marker. A criminal ordinance issued by Louis XIV in 1670 was far more severe in its punishment:
The dead person's body was hanged face down, in a six feet prepared wooden carriage or thrown on a garbage heap.
Additionally, all of the person's property will be confiscated.
In English, the wording did not emerge before the 1650s and in the Romance languages not before the second half of the eighteenth century.
The invention of the latinized term mirrored less stringent criminal prosecution of self-killing, in the wake of harsher punishments and the creation of a statutory offense that had found their semantic expression in the nominalization of “self-murder” since the second half of the sixteenth century.
The concept of “suicide” as well as (“self-disembodiment”) reflects a historical process of pathologizing and decriminalizing the act of taking one's own life.
However, regardless of the new words, the social stigmatization of self-killing was not eliminated, but merely transformed.
Criminal sanctions began to be abolished, but the priori criticism of “self-murder” did not.
In the eighteenth century, the traditional condemnation of self-killing, which had been based on religious and cosmological ideas, was turned into a moral one, in the specific enlightenment sense of the term.
What “self-murder” and “suicide” have in common is their denunciation of the act of killing oneself, not only in characterizing it as a crime, but also in pathologizing it as an expression of melancholic madness.
In doing so, both of them have become key concepts for the emergent disciplines of moral statistics and suicidology in the nineteenth century and for the modern understanding of self-killing within the discourses of social science, psychology, and psychiatry.
Although, the right to die is a concept based on the opinion that a human being is entitled to end their life or undergo voluntary euthanasia.
If we had a right to live, then one must have the right to die, both on their terms.
Death is a natural process of life thus there should not be any laws to prevent it if the patient seeks to end it.
What we do at the end of our lives should not be of concern to others in a mere parochial order.
If self killing is strictly controlled, we can avoid entering a slippery slope and prevent people from seeking alternative methods which may not be legal.
Possession of this right is often understood that a person with a terminal illness, or without the will to continue living, should be allowed to end their own life, use assisted suicide, or to decline life-prolonging treatment.
The question of whom, if anyone, should be empowered to make this decision is often central to the debate.
Some academics and philosophers, such as David Benatar, consider humans to be overly optimistic in their view of the quality of their lives, and their view of the balance between the positive and the negative aspects of living.
This idea can be considered in terms of antinatalism and the lack of agency regarding one's birth and who should have authority over one's choice to live or die.
According to scholars, Pipel and Amsel, ''the Proponents typically associate the right to die with the idea that one's body and one's life are one's own, to dispose of as one sees fit. However, a legitimate state interest in preventing irrational suicides is often up for debate''.
Contemporary proponents of "rational suicide" or the "right to die" usually demand by "rationality" that the decision to kill oneself be both the autonomous choice of the agent (i.e., not due to the physician or the family pressuring them to "do the right thing" and commit suicide) and a "best option under the circumstances" choice desired by the stoics or utilitarians, as well as other natural conditions such as the choice being stable, not an impulsive decision, not due to mental illness, achieved after due deliberation.
Hinduism accepts the right to die for those who are tormented by terminal diseases or those who have no desire, no ambition or no responsibilities remaining.
Death, however, allowed by non-violent means such as fasting to the point of starvation (Prayopavesa).
Jainism has a similar practice named Santhara.
Other religious views on suicide vary in their tolerance and include denial of the right as well as condemnation of the act.
In the Catholic faith, suicide is considered a grave sin.
Most Arguments against it is that it can lead to a slippery slope; if we allow this right, it can expand and have dire consequences.
Apart from the dire consequences, it can also give rise in pressuring those to end their lives or the lives of others; ethically immoral in human and medical standards.
Controlling the Availability of Sniper and other poisonous chemicals by the authority through advocacies and sensitization, may reduce direct killing effects whilst an indication of complete ban but a measure to curbing proliferation and perhaps abusive use within intending self killing victims.











